PENETRATION TESTING

Test the attack paths that matter before real attackers do.

Focused penetration testing across web applications, iOS and Android, APIs, backend systems, cloud, networks, identity, and infrastructure, built around your highest-impact attack paths.

Discuss your scope View relevant work

Review surface

Test the path an attacker would actually take.

A penetration test chaining one attack path across network, application, identity, cloud, and infrastructure, breaking at privilege escalation, then a finding, remediation, and a verified retest
  1. 01 Web, mobile, API & backend Authentication, sessions, authorization, business logic, data exposure, and integration boundaries.
  2. 02 External, cloud & infrastructure Internet-facing services, cloud control planes, secrets, CI/CD, storage, and remote access.
  3. 03 Internal, network & identity Segmentation, privileged access, lateral movement, internal services, and trust relationships.

Timing

When to test

Before launch

Before a public launch or material release.

After change

After a major cloud, identity, network, or architecture change.

Before assurance

Before an enterprise customer, insurer, audit, or assurance decision.

After concern

After an incident, acquisition, or concern about an exposed path.

Process

From agreed rules to validated attack paths.

  1. 01

    Scope and rules

    Confirm targets, accounts, windows, production constraints, exclusions, contacts, and stop conditions.

  2. 02

    Reconnaissance and testing

    Explore manually with supporting tools, then pursue the highest-value attack paths.

  3. 03

    Validate safely

    Confirm exploitability and capture evidence without unnecessary operational risk.

  4. 04

    Report and retest

    Deliver technical and executive views, work through remediation, and retest agreed findings.

Outputs / What you receive

Clear findings, practical fixes, and a report your team can use.

Validated findings

Evidence, affected assets, preconditions, impact, and remediation guidance.

Attack-path narrative

How an attacker could enter, escalate, move, and reach a sensitive outcome.

Technical and executive readouts

Technical detail and, where required, a material-risk view for leadership.

Retest status

Updated status where retesting of agreed in-scope remediations is included.

Typical engagement team

Who typically leads this work

The exact team depends on the scope. Every engagement has a principal who owns it from scoping through delivery, joined by the specialists the system calls for, and whoever is assigned is named in your proposal.

Łukasz Mikuła portrait

Łukasz Mikuła

Specialist Advisor

Offensive security specialist with 10+ years and 100+ public audits across eight ecosystems. At ING and Binance, worked across red teaming, exploit development, infrastructure, and high-scale digital asset systems.

Michal Bajor portrait

Michal Bajor

Specialist Advisor

Secured funding, custody, APIs, and on-chain systems at Kraken. Has reviewed 60+ Web3 projects across DeFi, L1s, bridges, oracles, and other critical infrastructure.

Piotr Cielas portrait

Piotr Cielas

Principal Advisor

Head of Security at Agora, responsible for security, data protection, and corporate IT risk. Earlier at EY, led assessments across financial services, healthcare, and government.

Currently

Head of Security, Agora

$45B+ in volume

Meet the full team

Inspectable proof

Relevant public work

Each card shows one highlighted finding, not the full result. Open the report for every finding and its severity.

Web application Public report

Sailor Lend

Web Application Security Review

Selected public finding Critical

Vulnerable to React2Shell

  • Web
  • Application
  • Security review
View report ↗
Off-chain Public report

Jump DeFi

Backend & Frontend Security Assessment

Selected public finding Critical

Indexer Crash Due to Invalid UTF-8 Character

  • NEAR
  • Off-chain
  • Rust & TypeScript
View report ↗
Smart contract Public report

Cleopetra

Solana Trading Bot Security Review

Selected public finding Medium

Incorrect Use of Async in Reward Distribution

  • Solana
  • Smart contract
  • TypeScript
View report ↗
View all public reports

FAQ

Questions before scoping

Can you test production systems?

Yes, when rules, access, timing, data handling, and stop conditions make the risk acceptable. Some cases may move to staging.

Is this only network testing?

No. The service covers web applications, iOS and Android, APIs, backend systems, AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, external and internal infrastructure, networks, identity, and privileged paths.

Do you use automated scanners?

Tools support discovery and coverage, but the engagement is manual, architecture-aware testing and validation.

Can you test authenticated roles and business logic?

Yes. Representative accounts, roles, workflows, and expected behavior let us evaluate authorization and business-critical paths.

Do you retest findings?

We include a retest for agreed in-scope findings and define the window, access, and reporting treatment in the proposal.

Related services

Secure Code ReviewsFind security flaws in critical code where automated scanners and checklist reviews stop.Security ReviewsSix focused reviews across applications, blockchain systems, custody, and AI workflows, matched to the layer your risk actually sits in.Risk AssessmentGive leadership a prioritized view of where security risk concentrates and what to address first.

Next step

Show us the attack surface.

Share the application, environment, architecture, target date, and the paths that matter most. We will propose the right test type and rules of engagement.

Discuss your scope